On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:20:49 +0100, Roman Zippel said: > > The point is, neither $BASH nor /bin/bash may be set. > > Is that really a problem? I think any system that has bash without > /bin/bash is simply broken. If you're trying to bootstrap a Linux box onto a new platform from some non-Linux Unixoid, it's possible that bash lives in $TOOLCHAIN/bin/bash. But I see that even Solaris 9 has a bash 2.05 in /bin/bash, so I might be talking out some odd orifice here.
Attachment:
pgp8reXT7FJUs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/3 take2] smaps: extract pte walker from smaps code
- Next by Date: Strange oops in iret_exc with my own module
- Previous by thread: Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH]
- Next by thread: Kbuild refactoring (Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH])
- Index(es):
 |