Re: device_destroy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:51:08PM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> While porting over a few class_devices I discovered a problem with 
> device_destroy. It uses a dev_t which several classes don't use. 
> Should all classes require a dev_t or should we just pass in the device
> itself?

As you don't have a dev_t, then you have a handle to the 'struct device'
itself, right?  Then just call device_unregister(), that's all that
device_destroy() does after it finds the device in the list of devices
associated with the class.

Does this help?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux