Hello,
I've noticed that extending a file using direct IO fails for FAT with
EINVAL. It's basically because of the following code in fat_direct_IO():
if (rw == WRITE) {
/*
* FIXME: blockdev_direct_IO() doesn't use
* ->prepare_write(),
* so we need to update the ->mmu_private to block
* boundary.
*
* But we must fill the remaining area or hole by nul for
* updating ->mmu_private.
*/
loff_t size = offset + iov_length(iov, nr_segs);
if (MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private < size)
return -EINVAL;
}
But isn't this check bogus? blockdev_direct_IO writes only to space that
is already allocated and stops as soon as it needs to extend the file
(further extension is then handled by buffered writes). So it should
already do what it needed for FAT. Thanks for an answer in advance.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
