Re: [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> was ufs_fs.h purposefully not exported to userspace or did it just slip 
> through the cracks ?  assuming the latter scenario, the attached patch 
> touches up the relationship between ufs_fs.h and its sub headers (like 
> ufs_fs_sb.h) so that we can export it ... the silo bootloader takes advantage 
> of this header for example


are you sure it actually uses anything from this header, and not just
assumes the magic number to be there??
(also.. I kind of would think it reasonable for things with their own
UFS fs reader to have their own header)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace
    • From: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace
    • From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace
    • From: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: is there any Hard-disk shock-protection for 2.6.18 and above?
• Next by Date: EV_MSC / driver/input/input.c (Input Handler)
• Previous by thread: [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] export ufs_fs.h to userspace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]