Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5

Hi Honza,

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Have you considered using similar hack as bad_inode.c instead of
> revoked_inode.c?

I am not sure what you mean, revoked_inode.c looks pretty much the same as 
bad_inode.c in mainline...

			Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]