How far should BLKROSET/set_device_ro() go?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While looking at another bug a while ago, I noticed that in 2.6 at least, set_device_ro() sets the policy on the hd_struct to mark it readonly, but it appears that IO is only really blocked from userspace, via generic_write_checks().

There are bdev_read_only() checks in other places, but nothing in a common spot to reject all possible IO.

Should we have something in generic_make_request() to reject ALL IO on a readonly bdev, or is that further than the policy is supposed to go? Or is it up to each location that might possibly issue that IO to check it and be well-behaved?

The motivation for this investigation was ext3 happily doing orphan inode recovery on read-only lvm snapshot....

Thanks,

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux