RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 irq: Handle irqs pending in IRR during irq migration.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> How about let apic_hangle_pending_vector take the irq too?

>We can't compute the vector by reading the hardware registers after
>we have acknowledged the irq.

>I hope that was the answer you were looking for I'm not quite certain
>what you mean by take.

I mean 


+static void apic_handle_pending_vector(unsigned vector)
+{
+	unsigned irr;
+	int irq;
+
+	irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector];
+	if (irq >= 0)
+		return;
+
+	/* If the irq we are servicing has moved and is not pending
+	 * free it's vector.
+	 */

==>

+static void apic_handle_pending_vector(unsigned vector, unsigned irqx)
+{
+	unsigned irr;
+	int irq;
+
+	irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector];
+	if ( (-irq) != irqx)
+		return;
+ 
+
+	/* If the irq we are servicing has moved and is not pending
+	 * free it's vector.
+	 */



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux