Re: [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
> To: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

argh.  Yesterday all my emails were getting a mysterious
s/osdl/linux-foundation/ done to them at the server, so I switched everything
over.  Now it would appear that they are getting an equally mysterious
s/linux-foundation/osdl/ done to them.  I assume you sent this to
[email protected]?


> Cc: Linux Kernel <[email protected]>, Linux Filesystems <[email protected]>, Linux Memory Management <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix
> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
> 
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:58:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 02:33:16 +0100
> > Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I think just setting page uptodate in commit_write might do the
> > > trick? (and getting rid of the set_page_dirty there).
> > 
> > Yes, the page just isn't uptodate yet in prepare_write() - moving things
> > to commti_write() sounds sane.
> > 
> > But please, can we have sufficient changelogs and comments in the next version?
> 
> You're right, sorry. Is this any better?

yup, thanks.

> (warning: nobh code is untested)

ow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux