Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:11:11 +0100 (MET) Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> 
> On Feb 2 2007 15:53, Paul Rolland wrote:
> >
> >If that is really one important point, why not simply adding a :
> >MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE("yes|no")
> >and a
> >MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LIKE_LICENSE("yes|no")
> >
> >or use 0 and 1 instead of yes and no, and thus clearly avoid all the
> >C string mess ?
> 
> MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE("yes\0 but only this .c file");


if (MODULE_LICENSE_contains_null(license))
	printk(KERN_WARNING "this module's license is suspicious\n");


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
    • From: "Paul Rolland" <[email protected]>
  • RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6.20 patch] v9fs_vfs_mkdir(): fix a double free
• Next by Date: [git patches] libata fixes
• Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]