On Friday February 2, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For no important reason, I've again looked at those zeroing patches that
> Neil did a while back. I've always thought that a simple
> `write(fd, NULL, size)` would cause the same sorts of problems.
Yeh, but who in their right mind would do that???
Oh, you did :-)
>
> Turns out it does. If you first write all 1s into a page, then do the
> `write(fd, NULL, size)` at the same position, you end up with all 0s in
> the page (test-case available on request). Incredible; surely this
> violates the spec?
Does it?
I guess filling with zeros isn't what one would expect, but you could
make a case for it being right.
write(fd, 0, size)
writes 'size' 0s. Cool. Ok, bad-cool.
>
> The buffered-write fixes I've got actually fix this properly, but they
> don't look like getting merged any time soon. We could do this simple
> patch which just reduces the chance of corruption from a certainty down
> to a small race.
>
> Any thoughts?
I cannot see why you make a change to fault_in_pages_writeable. Is it
just for symmetry?
For the rest, it certainly makes sense to return an early -EFAULT if
you cannot fault in the page.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
