Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:

>    Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns that
> Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some
> progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through.

Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as 
soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
    • From: Ethan Solomita <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SLAB] Shutdown cache_reaper when cpu goes down
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]