Trent Waddington wrote:
On 2/2/07, Jon Masters <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok. I totally dig the *idea* here - I mean, this issue has been ongoing
for a long time now. But I'd like to see a few comments as to whether we
need a technological mechanism here to enforce the obvious. To me, it
just seems totally obvious (any legal comment?) that early C string
termination is undermining the intent of the MODULE_LICENSE tag.
I'm not a lawyer, but I can tell you exactly what a lawyer would say:
"well, ya know, it's hard to say when it comes to these issues"
that's the answer to *any* copyright question. :)
to me it even screams "bypassing or a digital copyright enforcement system".
that sounds really close to "D.M.C.A. violation" :)
thank goodness I'm not a laywer...
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
