Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
It would be interesting to know what the inode numbers are in the image; also,
what is the exact behaviour -- do you end up with a missing link, or do both
entries end up getting hard-linked to an empty file?

Judging by the

	request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000

one or more of the hardlinked binaries (modprobe being one, but not necessarily the one that initially triggers hits) will read all zeroes-

Or at least bytes at offsets 2 and 3 will read as zero, causing it to not be recognized as a proper binary, causing that "binfmt-0000" thing.


Or perhaps not read at all, which would explain the problem.

cpio represents a hard link as who headers with the same type and the same file (inode) number and a link count that is > 1. Only the first one contains data; the subsequent ones have length 0. It's fairly easy for a bug in the decoder to truncate the file upon encountering the second header, since this is somewhat of a special case (it would have been better if the cpio format distinguished "hard link" explicitly, as tar does.)

I will look into this as soon as I can, but as I'm currently in the middle of job hunting it might take until the weekend.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux