Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

On 1/29/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> wrote:

1. Scheduling fairness.
Since kernel does not know about multiple threads behind given process,
it can not add it appropriate number of timeslices for execution.
Can be solved either by more tight collaboarion of the userspace and
kernelspace schedulers or simply by increasing process' nice value.

nice value is only meaningful for SCHED_OTHER.  How will you handle a
multithreaded realtime application that uses SCHED_OTHER as well as
SCHED_FIFO threads?

Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]