On Tue, 2007-01-30 21:23:34 +0100, Diego Calleja <[email protected]> wrote: > El Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:31:01 +0100 (MET), Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> escribió: > > Don't they claim 50+? Already browsing > > ftp://ftp.de.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-3.1 gives more than 2 > > screenfuls [à 25]. > > Sure, Linux doesn't support vax and the like, but it does support lots of > architectures that matter. In http://netbsd.org/Ports/#ports-by-cpu there's a Well, there *is* a 2.6.x based VAX port, though it needs some updates to incorporate the last few months of upstream development. But NetBSD still does better hardware support. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- References:
- Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- Free Linux Driver Development!
- Prev by Date: Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19.2 oops after resume from ram (corruption?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- Next by thread: Re: Free Linux Driver Development!
- Index(es):
 |