Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:20 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> The purpose of clocksource_initcall is so the initcall can be increased
> without changing all the individual clocksources .. So I have to
> disconnect that from the acpi_pm because it can't tolerate it.

Each clocksource has to decide on its own, when the registration is
done. ARM clocksources register in the timer init, pm timer needs to
wait. 

So what exactly is solved by an extra initcall ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/23] clocksource update v12
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: mtd - fix a pci_find_device
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 23/23] clocksource tsc: add verify routine
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority
• Next by thread: [PATCH 03/23] clocksource: drop clocksource-remove-the-update-callback.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]