Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 19:02 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Btw, this is also something where we should just disallow certain system 
> calls from being done through the asynchronous method. 

Does that mean that doing an AIO-disabled syscall will wait for all in-
flight AIO syscalls to finish ?

	Xav


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [BUG]: 2.6.19.2: Weird serial core issue
• Next by Date: remove_proc_entry and read_proc
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]