Jes Sorensen wrote:
Greg Ungerer wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.
Which is good, provided that non-mmu work is actively driving some of
the decisions in mainline. Given that I don't follow the non-mmu work
at all, I don't have a feel for whether that is the case, but I could
imagine that it would have some impact that needs to be taken into
account at times.
Exactly.
My worry is for spending time and slots on things /
people dealing with classic architectures which are no longer being
manufactured and are only being maintained in catch-up mode.
Agreed, but I haven't seen that in the past. The CPU panel at least
has always covered current (and future) hardware.
Regards
Greg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
