Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I looked at this approach a long time ago, and basically gave up because
it looked like too much work.

Indeed, your mention of it in that thread.. a year ago?.. is what got this notion sitting in the back of my head. I didn't like it at first, but it grew on me.

I heartily approve, although I only gave the actual patches a very cursory glance. I think the approach is the proper one, but the devil is in the
details. It might be that the stack allocation overhead or some other
subtle fundamental problem ends up making this impractical in the end, but
I would _really_ like for this to basically go in.

As for efficiency and overhead, I hope to get some time with the team that work on the Giant Database Software Whose Name We Shall Not Speak. That'll give us some non-trival loads to profile.

It won't matter at all for a certain class of calls (a lot of the people
who want to do AIO really end up doing non-interruptible things, and
signalling is a non-issue), but not only is it going to matter for some others, we will almost certainly want to have a way to not just signal a task, but a single "fibril" (and let me say that I'm not convinced about
your naming, but I don't hate it either ;)

Yeah, no doubt. I'm wildly open to discussion here. (and yeah, me either, but I don't care much about the name. I got tired of qualifying overloaded uses of 'stack' or 'thread', that's all :)).

But from a quick overview of the patches, I really don't see anything
fundamentally wrong. It needs some error checking and some limiting (I
_really_ don't think we want a regular user starting a thousand fibrils concurrently), but it actually looks much less invasive than I thought it
would be.

I think we'll also want to flesh out the submission and completion interface so that we don't find ourselves frustrated with it in another 5 years. What's there now is just scaffolding to support the interesting kernel-internal part. No doubt the kevent thread will come into play here.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux