Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:04:42PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
>>From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
>>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:00:11 +0100
>>
>>>"depends on IPV6" would fix the bug - but it would also make
>>>NF_CONNTRACK_H323 unavailable for all people without IPV6 support in
>>>their kernel.
>>
>>Yes, that is an issue.
>>
>>I guess with some slightly ugly ifdefs we could support the
>>whole matrix of possibilities. But perhaps that's undesirable
>>for another reason.
>>...
>
>
> This depends on what NF_CONNTRACK_H323=y, IPV6=m is supposed to be:
> - not allowed (NF_CONNTRACK_H323 must be modular) or
> - NF_CONNTRACK_H323 can only be used for IPV4
>
> My patch implements the first case.
Unfortunately a few ifdefs aren't enough to support IPV6=m,
NF_CONNTRACK_H323=y. For now I think Adrian's patch is the
best solution (IPV6=m isn't that useful anyway since it will
normally get loaded automatically when the first program
attempts to open an AF_INET6 socket and can't be unloaded),
but I'll look into moving the route lookup to the netfilter
AF ops in 2.6.21 so we can also support that configuration.
Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
