Re: Support for i386 PATs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:20:18AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
 > Hi!
> > Does anybody have a strong opinion against adding support for
 > i386 Page Attribute Tables?

It pops up about once a year, everyone agrees it'd be a good idea,
and then nothing happens.  Last year, I started picking over
Terrence Ripperda's original implementation, but that needs a bit
of work. (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/12/187)
Whoa, two years even.  Time flies.

		Dave

Ah.
This might explain why nothing happens :).

I had something much simpler in mind.
Just the basic PAT setup and some new pgprot_ types which affected drivers could use directly.

Like in(drivers/char/drm/drm_vm.c) where ia64 has a pgprot_writecombine() function.

/Thomas




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux