Hi Nick,
Le Mardi 30 Janvier 2007 14:38, Nick Piggin a écrit :
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Yes, this sounds like the right thing to do. So here comes the third
> > (and hopefully last) iteration of the patch:
>
> Thanks Jean, this patch works fine for me.
Great, thanks for testing.
> Is this 2.6.20 material? Might it cause more regressions than it fixes?
I do believe this is 2.6.20 material. Given that Alan's version doesn't work
_at all_, my patch can only help. The real regression is between 2.6.19 and
the current Linus tree (with Alan's quirk.)
> Andrew, can you pick up this patch in place of the old one you got
> (fix-via-irq-quirk-breakage.patch). It was sent to lkml just now.
Yes, please. And possibly send it over to Linus while you're there, if
everyone's happy with this version.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
Suse L3
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
