Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530
Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800
"Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
- It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to
apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation
errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to
runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.
dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ?
OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get
temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat.
Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ?
Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio
patches.
On a happy note - mm2 seems to pass testing much better ;-)
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
