Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de

--- Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> wrote:

> True, but a system that disables proc is likely a
> system with a custom
> policy anyway, and dependency on proc is fairly
> basic to selinux these
> days (due to reliance on /proc/self/attr for process
> attribute
> manipulation in place of the old selinux syscalls). 
> Possibly we should
> just make selinux depend on proc and drop the #ifdef
> there.

Alternativly you could move the SELinux specific
bits out of /proc/self/attr into an equivalent
/selinux/self/attr and avoid that /proc dependency.



Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
    • From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
    • From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] tty: cleanup release_mem
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove global locks from mm/highmem.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl selinux: Don't look at table->de
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]