Re: [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> provide an unsigned long atomic type.

Is this really necessary? We have no atomic_uint_t type either.

Could you use atomic_long_t instead?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/14] Concurrent Page Cache
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: vger truncating CC lists
• Next by Date: Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t
• Next by thread: [PATCH 03/14] radix-tree: gang_lookup_tag_slot
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]