Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes

On Thursday 25 January 2007 22:37, David Rientjes wrote:
> Any leftover memory is allocated
> to a final node unless the command-line ends with a comma.

That sounds like syntactical vinegar and a nasty trap. Remember 
that venus probe that got lost because of a wrong comma.
Can you find some nicer syntax for that please? 

Also it's pretty complex. Are there use cases for all of this? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch -mm 1/5] x86_64: configurable fake numa node sizes
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • [patch -mm 2/5] x86_64: split remaining fake nodes equally
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: blacklist kernel boot option
• Next by Date: Re: - romsignature-checksum-cleanup-2.patch removed from -mm tree
• Previous by thread: [patch -mm 5/5] x86_64: fake numa for cpusets document
• Next by thread: Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]