Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:20:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> klist is quite different in that it locks the whole list. The proposed
> data structure locks each edge, that is it will allow concurrent
> deletion of elements as long as they don't share neighbours.

Yes, that's one of the reasons why I dislike klist even more ;-) 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]
• Next by Date: Re: lockmeter
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2/7] lock_list: a fine grain locked double linked list]
• Next by thread: RE: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]