Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:26:03 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:

> FWIW, I just tried it with 2.6.20-rc6, and can confirm.  Once nero is
> run, the kernel never gives up retrying whatever command failed, so I
> get...
> 
> [ 4362.972995] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete
> DataRequest }
> [ 4362.981475] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> [ 4362.986183] hdd: drive not ready for command
> 
> endlessly.

Do you have time to bisect it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linux 2.6.20-rc6
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
    • From: "Uwe Bugla" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1
• Next by Date: Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH} XFS: Remove placeholders for unimplemented functionality.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]