On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >[]
> >
> >>I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
> >>source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
> >>something else), but patches.
> >>
> >
> >IMHO it's dealing with consequences, not cause, and it's even worse.
> >
> How many patches is not to fix bugs, it is worse then some strayed
> whitespace but it is due to reality.
> The best is, of course, if neither happened but the next best thing is
1. Patches are signed-off (not by you).
2. Maybe Andrew Morton under his sign-off add such feature.
> >> (otherwise I believe they just deleted my mail ;) ).
> >>
> >
> >I would like to discuss, would you?
> >
> I like to discuss but I am not sure what the result would be. Force
> people to use the editors of our choice?
> As long people uses valid e-mail-clients when sending patches (or they
> use the script "sendpatchset"), I'm think we have to be satisfied.
> But if you have any ideas, I'm listening.
Open-source worker, hammering his fingers? Please, let me out it ;D
> Richard Knutsson
>
_____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
