Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]

Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
> RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.

It is.  Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do.  It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for optimisations),
easy to use (you'll have single array instead of at least 3), and a bit
more flexible;  at the same way it's less widely tested...

But the end result is basically the same for both ways.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
    • From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
  • Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 4/6] msi: Remove attach_msi_entry.
• Next by Date: [PATCH 5/6] msi: Kill the msi_desc array.
• Previous by thread: Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
• Next by thread: Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]