On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:06:39PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > Remove the sole remaining reference to the apparently dead config
> > variable CONFIG_UNWIND_INFO.
>
> Regardless of unwinder future, patch doesn't update defconfigs all
> over the tree.
as i understand it, it's not supposed to. it was explained to me once
that those defconfigs are regularly rebuilt, and will lose that
reference automatically once there's no corresponding kernel config
variable anymore.
someone care to clarify this? because i remember distinctly once upon
a time being told *not* to mess with any defconfig files in a patch.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://www.fsdev.dreamhosters.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
