On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 07:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * john stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Although, to be fair, I do know that Daniel has future sched_clock
> > related patches that need his cleanups [...]
>
> btw., i dont find those sched_clock() changes really acceptable in their
> present form, and i've pointed out my reasons for that in the past, ~2
> months ago when Daniel last sent his cleanup queue.
I address your complaints .. You said you didn't want sched_clock to
have the underlying clock selectable, and it's not any longer .. You
also said I was adding cycles to the scheduling hot patch which I
addressed , but it's not clear if really needed.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
