Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available

On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 19:30 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:

> The problem isn't packets that are too big, the problem is we can get
> unexpected / too many empty packets, which will then cause the DMA
> engine to move on to the next descriptor before the payload buffer has
> been completely filled. 

I was under the impression that for an empty packet, the descriptor
wouldn't fire at all.  Is that not correct?

-David

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
    • From: "Kristian Høgsberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
    • From: Pieter Palmers <[email protected]>
  • Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
    • From: David Moore <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH -rt 1/2] RCU priority boosting that survives semi-vicious testing
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] init: support preset lpj value as config option
• Previous by thread: Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
• Next by thread: Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]