On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Chris Rankin wrote:
>
> I suppose what I'm *really* asking is what the basis is for assuming that this *isn't* a kernel
> bug and can therefore be safely ignored, seeing as the oops is real, the hardware is fine and the
> kernel is untainted? That seems to cover the bases from where I'm sitting.
All I'm claiming is that it's no more a reason to avoid 2.6.19*
than to avoid any other release (the kernels before 2.6.7 happened
to have no such check, but that doesn't imply they were any safer).
It may indeed be due to a kernel bug, but I can't tell you where: sorry.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
