Hi!
> > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:13:19AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > we dont call the reboot notifiers during emergency reboot mainly because
> > > > it could be called from atomic context and reboot notifiers are a
> > > > blocking notifier list. But actually the kernel is often perfectly
> > > > reschedulable in this stage, so we could as well process the
> > > > reboot_notifier_list.
> > >
> > > My experience has been that when there has been the need to use this
> > > facility, the kernel hasn't been reschedulable. [...]
> >
> > this decision is totally automatic - so if your situation happens and
> > the kernel isnt reschedulable, then the notifier chain wont be called
> > and nothing changes from your perspective. Hm, perhaps this should be
> > dependent on CONFIG_PREEMPT, to make sure preempt_count() is reliable?
> >
> > but from my perspective this patch fixes a real regression.
> >
> > updated patch attached below.
> >
>
> Making it dependent upon CONFIG_PREEMPT seems a bit sucky. Perhaps pass in
> some "you were called from /proc/sysrq-trigger" notification?
What about adding 'B' with 'reboot with notifications' meaning?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
