Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness

Hi!

> > nor will they work if the sysadmin applies a security update and glibc
> > or another library changes one page in size. Or changes the stack rlimit
> > or .. or ..
> 
> Now, i figured out, there is a certain reasonable safety gap which works
> for people, because the libraries depended on are well known.
> 
> What happens with AS randomisation, is that the variance is simply too
> large. But what is more important, is that vendors do modifications
> which change the amount of randomisation, which means that potentially

Complain to vendors, not here.

							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
  - From: Samium Gromoff <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
  - From: Samium Gromoff <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
  - From: Samium Gromoff <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC 2/6] bidi support: request_io_part
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]