Hi,
>>>(run echo 1 > coremask, echo 0 > coremask in a loop while dumping
>>>core. Do you have enough locking to make it work as expected?)
>>
>>Currently, any lock isn't acquired. But I think the kernel only
>>have to preserve the coremask setting in a local variable at the
>>begining of core dumping. I'm going to do this in the next version.
>
> No, I do not think that is enough. At minimum, you'd need atomic_t
> variable. But I'd recomend against it. Playing with locking is tricky.
Why do you think it is not enough? I think that any locking is not
needed.
My design principle is that the core dump routine is controlled by
the bitmask which was assigned to the dumping process at the time of
starting core dump. So if a coremask setting is changed while
core dumping, the change doesn't affect current dumping process.
This can be implemented as follows:
core_dump_start:
unsigned int mask = current->mm->coremask;
for each VMA {
write a header which depends on the result of maydump(vma, mask)
}
for each VMA {
write a body which depends on the result of maydump(vma, mask)
}
NOTE:
maydump() is the central function, which decides whether a given
VMA should be dumped or not.
What do you think about this?
Best regards,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
