Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to
types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over
100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the
source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and
hundreds of *uses* of TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the
very least, by adding two lines to types.h, you can delete all
those redundant *definitions* and make sure that nothing breaks.
(it shouldn't, of course, but it's always nice to be sure.)
Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition
we're trying to get rid of.
hmmmmmmmm ... apparently, you totally missed my use of the important
word "temporarily":
No, I didn't.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
