No problem. Will resend the full patch set for 2.6.21.
Thanks
Nam
[email protected] wrote on 18.01.2007
13:56:01:
> I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the
> previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on
> top of them?
>
> Can please you resend me the full series of patch that remove the use
> of do_mmap(), with all cleanups and bug fixes included? And please
> roll up the fixes, I don't want one patch that adds a yield() inside a
> spinlock and then a later patch to fix it -- there's no sense in
> adding landmines for people potentially doing git bisect in the
> future.
>
> And also please try to split the patches so that they don't mix
> together two things -- please try to make the "remove obsolete
> prototypes" patch separate from the mmap fixes.
>
> Thanks...
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
