Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:17:37AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> I'll be happy to move this over to the utrace setting, once it is merged.  
> Do you think it would be better to include the current version of kwatch 
> now or to wait for utrace?
> 
> Roland, is there a schedule for when you plan to get utrace into -mm?

Even if it goes into mainline soon we'll need a lot of time for all
architectures to catch up, so I think kwatch should definitely comes first.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] sata_nv: cleanup ADMA error handling v2
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]