Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken

* Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:

> And actually the lock stuff is OK, since it's not inlined -- it's the 
> unlock stuff that goes directly to the __raw versions.  But something 
> like the following works for me; does it look OK to you?

yeah, it looks good to me too. Hopefully this will work with the include 
file ordering of all platforms.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
  • Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] flush_cpu_workqueue: don't flush an empty ->worklist
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
• Previous by thread: Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
• Next by thread: [PATCH] intel_agp: restore graphics device's pci space early in resume
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]