On Tuesday, 16. January 2007 06:37, Nate Diller wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 05:54:50PM -0800, Nate Diller wrote:
> > > Convert code using iocb->ki_left to use the more generic iov_length() call.
> >
> > No way. We need to reduce the numer of iovec traversals, not adding
> > more of them.
>
> ok, I can work on a version of this that uses struct iodesc. Maybe
> something like this?
>
> struct iodesc {
> struct iovec *iov;
> unsigned long nr_segs;
> size_t nbytes;
> };
>
> I suppose it's worth doing the iodesc thing along with this patchset
> anyway, since it'll avoid an extra round of interface churn.
What about this instead
struct iodesc {
struct iovec *iov;
unsigned long nr_segs;
unsigned long seg_limit;
size_t nr_bytes;
};
That will enable resizeable iodescs with partial completion state and
will enable successive filling of an iodesc with iovs.
This will be needed anyway. I built an complete short userspace
module for that already. I can post and GPLv2 it somewhere, if people
are interested.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
