On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 14:57:56 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> >Subject: Re: I broke my port numbers :(
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 23:55:15 +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
> >> I know this may be entirely my fault but I have tried reversing
> >> all of my _own_ patches I applied to 2.6.19.2 but can't find what broke this.
> >> I did three times "netcat 127.0.0.69 42", notice the different
> >> port numbers.
> >
> >Hmm... when I do "rmmod iptable_nat ip_nat", it works.
>
> Then please show us your rulset that was loaded (iptables-save) before
> you removed the modules.
For -t nat I had only
-t nat -P PREROUTING ACCEPT
-t nat -P POSTROUTING ACCEPT
-t nat -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
but due to my modifications to ip_nat_proto_tcp.c
it broke (ip_nat_proto_tcp.c wasn't supposed to get used,
anyways).
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
