Robert P. J. Day schrieb: > OTOH, since that code *is* in the allegedly obsolete old ISDN4Linux > code, perhaps that entire part of the tree can just be junked. but if > it's sticking around, it should probably be fixed. Please do not remove isdn4linux just yet. It's true that it has been marked as obsolete for quite some time, but it's still needed anyway. Its designated successor, the CAPI subsystem, so far only supports a very limited range of hardware. Dropping isdn4linux now would leave the owners of some very popular ISDN cards out in the cold. Thanks, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- References:
- any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: Initramfs and /sbin/hotplug fun
- Next by Date: Re: tuning/tweaking VM settings for low memory (preventing OOM)
- Previous by thread: Re: any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- Next by thread: Re: any value to fixing apparent bugs in old ISDN4Linux?
- Index(es):
 |