On Jan 15 2007 11:18, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jan 15 2007 09:39, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not sure how well that will work (the IPv4/IPv6-specific stuff
>>>is spread over the entire target function), but its worth a try.
>>
>>
>> well here's a q: would a patch be accepted that changes
>> all ipt and ip6t modules to the new xt? Even if a module is only for
>> ipv4 or ipv6, I think it makes sense to reduce the number of
>> different *t structures floating around.
>
>If you're talking about using the xt-structures in net/ipv[46]/netfilter
>and removing the ipt/ip6t-wrappers, that would make sense IMO.
Yup. Should the files then be renamed/moved to net/netfilter/xt_[foobaz].c
in a second step?
Should I leave ipt_TCPMSS/ip6t_TCPMSS untouched while you are working on
that one?
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
