Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:54:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> It's still possible that this is hardware related; perhaps some component
> just began to wear out.  If you return to an earlier kernel, does the 
> problem go away?

As reported in my original e-mail and verified just minutes ago, the
copy succeeds with 2.6.19 (kernel.org vanilla, compiled with the same
config as 2.6.20-rcX).  I will begin bisecting between .19 and .20-rc1
after re-reading Jiri's messages.

florin

-- 
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
      http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
    • From: [email protected] (Florin Iucha)

• Prev by Date: it821x trouble since 2.6.18
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
• Previous by thread: it821x trouble since 2.6.18
• Next by thread: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]