Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)

I wrote:
> gcc -o test3.o test.c test.c
                           ^^ typo
gcc -o test3.o test.c test2.c
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 07/12] mark struct file_operations const 7
• Next by Date: [patch 09/12] mark struct file_operations const 9
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]