On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 00:51 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> I just wanted to know the rationale behind
> 99ef3ef8d5f2f5b5312627127ad63df27c0d0d05 (no more "device" symlink in
> class devices). I thought that was a rather convenient way of finding
> which physical device the class device was coupled to.
The plan is to have a single unified tree at /sys/devices, where all
device-directories live below their parents, and /sys/class contains
only symlinks pointing into this single tree, just like /sys/bus.
People want to stack class-devices, but this leads to a /sys/devices
tree and several small trees spread around in /sys/class. These trees
need to be connected by "device"-links and the "class:"-links, which
just doesn't make much sense if you can have one single tree with the
same information.
In the unified tree, the "device"-link will always just point to the
parent device, that's why there is a config option to disable these
links and test current software not to depend on it.
There was a long discussion on lkml about all that, maybe a year ago,
while converting "input".
Thanks,
Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
