On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:31:36AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Index: at91/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> ===================================================================
> --- at91.orig/scripts/mod/modpost.c 2007-01-11 22:51:49.000000000 -0800
> +++ at91/scripts/mod/modpost.c 2007-01-12 04:20:00.000000000 -0800
> @@ -679,6 +679,26 @@ static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol(struct e
> }
>
> /*
> + * If there's no name there, ignore it; likewise, ignore it if it's
> + * one of the magic symbols emitted used by current ARM tools.
> + *
> + * Otherwise if find_symbols_between() returns those symbols, they'll
> + * fail the whitelist tests and cause lots of false alarms ... fixable
> + * only by shrinking __exit and __init sections into __text, bloating
> + * the kernel (which is especially evil on embedded platforms).
> + */
> +static int is_valid_name(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Sym *sym)
> +{
> + const char *name = elf->strtab + sym->st_name;
> +
> + if (!name || !strlen(name))
> + return 0;
> + if (strcmp(name, "$a") == 0 || strcmp(name, "$d") == 0)
> + return 0;
A more correct test would be that found in kallsyms.c:
/*
* This ignores the intensely annoying "mapping symbols" found
* in ARM ELF files: $a, $t and $d.
*/
static inline int is_arm_mapping_symbol(const char *str)
{
return str[0] == '$' && strchr("atd", str[1])
&& (str[2] == '\0' || str[2] == '.');
}
Suggest that code is re-used here (as well as in other tools such as
oprofile, readprofile, etc.)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
