Re: [patch] sched: avoid div in rebalance_tick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:59:40AM +0000, Alan wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:02:13 +0100
> Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just noticed this while looking at a bug.
> > Avoid an expensive integer divide 3 times per CPU per tick.
> Integer divide is cheap on some modern processors, and multibit shift
> isn't on all embedded ones.

Well integer divide unit is non-pipelined on P4 K8 Core2 and probably
most processors, AFAIK. So the 3 divs would take 240 cycles on a P4,

> How about putting back scale = 1 and using
> scale += scale;
> instead of the shift and getting what ought to be even better results

Yes I gues we ccan do this as well, good idea. I'll make a
quick userspace benchmark and post some numbers with my next
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux